beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.04.16 2014고정1190

액화석유가스의안전관리및사업법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who sells liquefied petroleum gas under the trade name of “D” in Ansan-gu Mayang-si C.

A liquefied petroleum gas dealer shall separate charging containers and residual gas containers and store them in a container storage room, except where they are transported in compliance with the technical standards for facilities selling liquefied petroleum gas, but the following day from June 30, 2014 to June 23:25, 2014.

7. 1. up to 01:38, freight containers (20 km) and 20 residual gas containers (20 km) parked in D retail stores violated the technical standards for liquefied petroleum gas sales facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Public interest report;

1. Evidence photographs;

1. Application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the violation photograph;

1. Article 48 of the relevant Act and the Safety Control of Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Business Act regarding criminal facts and Articles 48 subparagraph 3 and 13 (1) of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. However, the defendant and the defense counsel's assertion that the cargo container and the remaining gas container are loaded in the cargo vehicle as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the court below, since the above container was in operation D business hours at the time, it is not in violation of the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act even if the above container was not stored in the container storage room. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant can be recognized as having violated the technical standards for liquefied Petroleum Gas sales facilities and the fact that it is during business hours