A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and by a fine of three hundred thousand won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On July 28, 201, Defendant A, at the center of the victim B, who was in the Macheon-si F, Defendant A, on the roads below the victim B, her mother, her mother, expressed that the victim B (the son and the 71-year-old-old-age-old-age-old-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-at-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

2. Defendant B, who was beyond the aforementioned time and at a place, assaulted the above victim B at two times on the floor of the defective hand by causing the victim H (ma, 63 years of age) of the above A’s father.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first trial record;

1. Each of the whole or part of the witness H, A, B, and I’s legal statement;

1. Results of this Court’s CD verification

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury and the choice of a fine);

B. Defendant B: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of fine)

1. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the custody of a workhouse

1. 피고인 A의 주장에 관한 판단 피고인 A은 피해자 B을 밀쳐 넘어뜨린 사실이 없고, 단지 피고인의 어머니에게 시비를 거는 피해자를 막아서며 피해자의 옷을 움켜잡았을 뿐인데 위 피해자가 ‘기둥뿌리가 흔들흔들 하게 해 주겠다’라고 하면서 뒤로 드러누웠고, 머리를 스스로 바닥에 찧어 자해를 한 것이고, 피해자의 옷을 움켜잡은 것은 피고인의 어머니를 보호하기 위한 정당행위라는 취지의 주장을 하므로 살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 각 증거에 의하면, 위 피고인이 피해자를 밀어 바닥에 넘어드린 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 주장은 더 나아가 판단할 필요 없이 이유 없다.

2. Defendant B’s assertion