폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the purport of the Defendant’s grounds of appeal (e.g., the Defendant’s mistake, and the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes by drinking alcohol and contingently, and that the Defendant must support his mother, her child, and her wife, the lower court’s sentence which sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is not appropriate that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant, without any reason, with a view to 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as provoking a trial fee to customers, taking the victim's desire to punish the victim, sound, etc., and interfere with the victim's restaurant business operation for 20 minutes after the victim's occurrence of the disturbance, and the victim F who once after a few times of the disturbance, took the face of plastic chairs, which is a dangerous object, and took the face several times of the face, and took care of about 14 days of the head, it is not good that the crime was committed. The defendant can have the record of criminal punishment due to the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and the victim expressed his intention that the victim would not want the punishment of the defendant, considering the motive and circumstance of each of the crimes of this case, the victim's motive and circumstance, damage records before and after the crime of this case, and other circumstances, the defendant's argument that the punishment of this case is unfair in light of the above circumstances as stated in the Criminal Act.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal for conclusion. It is so decided as per Disposition