2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

At around 03:00 on April 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called the Defendant for 14 times while under the influence of alcohol, and caused the hummatic defect; and (b) at around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendant damaged the property by leaving the Defendant’s hump to the house of the 1st floor E of the Changwon-si, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, the said victim was suffering from the 26-day hump to the victim’s face; (c) taking care of approximately 26-day hump to the victim’s face; and (d) taking care of the 30,000 won hump to the hump, the victim was worn.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Investigation report (to listen to the Eline Statements of Witnesses);

1. Photographs, such as the site, the upper part, etc.;

1. Application of an injury diagnosis certificate (C) and receipt Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of an alternative fine;

4. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

5. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.