2. The judgment is a favorable condition for the following reasons: (a) the defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case as committing each of the crimes in this case and reflects the wrongness; and (b)

However, considering the fact that the social harm of drinking driving is serious and the statutory punishment is increased at the request of the people demanding the strengthening of punishment, it is necessary to punish the crime of drinking driving strictly.

The defendant has a record of being punished several times due to drinking driving, and the fact that he/she has been sentenced to a summary order on June 1, 2018 due to drinking driving on a one-year basis after he/she was issued a summary order on June 1, 2018 is a disadvantageous condition.

In full view of the above circumstances, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of crime, and circumstances after the commission of crime, etc., as well as all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, and the fact that there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment, it cannot be deemed unfair

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.