However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “E restaurant” restaurant operated by the victim D in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, around 13:00 on February 17, 2018, the Defendant: (b) was demanded by his employees to avoid disturbance, such as singing the music by using the cell phone, and singinging the music to sing away from the cell phone; and (c) he was asked by the employees from the victims who run the business at the place to sing the disturbance on several occasions; (d) the Defendant singing the table in hand, singing the table, singing the table, singing the table on the floor containing food on the table; (d) 40 minutes of the disturbance, singing the victim’s name in a different table; and (e) 160 minutes of the disturbance and sing the employees’ demand to leave the restaurant as reported by the police officer; and (e) 160 days of leaving the restaurant.

Note 1. Sheab to throw away “Chewing, Chewing, and racks.”

“Plaved” with a large scale, and on the tables;

It was difficult to avoid the disturbance between about 10 minutes, such as walking a pre-determined tin plate by generating it.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On February 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the restaurant parking lot as indicated in paragraph (1) around 13:32 on February 17, 2018; (b) at the restaurant parking lot as indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant was carrying around 0.3 square meters of fallen leaves with a shotf, etc. belonging to the Gangnam Police Station, which called the place of the restaurant business by avoiding the disturbance, with the report of 112, such as D, the owner of the above restaurant; and (c) at the slope F, etc., of which the instant developments were verified, the Defendant was

Accordingly, the defendant set fire to set fire and destroyed the fallen leaves, which are general goods, thereby causing public danger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. The 112 reported case settlement table, respectively;

1. Five copies of a photograph of the CCTV to be submitted to the victim;

1. Five copies of the investigation report (in cases of attaching on-site photographs, etc.), five photographs;

1. A report on investigation (in case of 26 pages of investigation records);

1. Three copies of the investigation report (in the face of 42 pages of investigation records), three photographs;

1. A investigation report (verification of CCTV at a place of occurrence) and CCTV at a place of occurrence shall be cut down;