beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.08.29 2017가단10394

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The head of the ASEAN Tax Office’s second taxpayer designation disposition and notice 1) against the Plaintiff of the ASEAN Tax Office is a corporation B (hereinafter “B”).

(2) The head of the Asan Tax Office confirmed that B’s shares were owned by the Plaintiff, 30% of the Plaintiff’s imprisonment C, 27.5% of the Plaintiff’s living together, and 67.5% of the Plaintiff’s total amount of 182,90,810 won on June 25, 2013 pursuant to Article 39(2) of the former Framework Act on National Taxes (amended by Act No. 9911, Jan. 1, 2010), and confirmed that B’s shares were owned by 30%, 27.5% of the Plaintiff’s imprisonment, and 305% of the Plaintiff’s share ratio on July 18, 2013. < Amended by Act No. 1188, Jun. 25, 2013; Act No. 11854, Jun. 25, 2013>

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff received a notice of payment on the instant disposition at the time of the date of each of the above dispositions.

3) On the back of the notice of payment sent by the director of the Busan District Tax Office to taxpayers, the following notice was printed, but the back of the notice received by the Plaintiff was not printed. 4. If there is an objection to this disposition, the Plaintiff may file an objection (within 90 days, the competent tax office, regional tax office, or regional tax office) within 90 days from the date of receipt of the notice of payment, or file a request for examination (within 90 days, or file a request for examination or adjudgment (within 90 days, or may immediately file a request for examination or adjudgment without filing an objection, or file a request for examination via the Board of Audit and Inspection of the competent tax office. (b) On July 2013 to August 8, 2013.