When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 20, 2016, around 17:14 to 17:52, the Defendant was investigating the Seoul Eastern Police Station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, as well as the 5 team office in the economy, into the police station investigation into the police station in Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and being investigated as the person who was the victim of the attempted incident, and was working for the police station E to look at the refugee of the UN Welfare Federation Africa.

The United Nations identification card issued in the name of the Secretary-General of the United Nations on a half-year term, which is a forged private document was presented.

The Defendant, as above, exercised the above fact-finding document.

2. On March 24, 2016: (a) around 13:30 to 13:50 on March 24, 2016, the Defendant, at the prosecutor’s office located in Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Prosecutor’s Office 702 located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was investigated as the person who was attempted to commit fraud, was under investigation by the prosecutor himself/herself as the president of the UN.

At the same time, I suggested one's UN identification card issued in the name of the Secretary General of the United Nations prior to Clofi Atta (Dr. Kofitta Annan) in Cloa, a forged private document.

The Defendant, as above, exercised the above fact-finding document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Re-written investigation of the suspect against the defendant (one time) and re-written investigation of the suspect against the defendant (one time)

1. Entry of each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence 6 ( UN identification Card);

1. To act after closely examining whether the criminal defendant is a future forgery document or not, under Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the defendant is late at the time of committing the crime at latest and is about whether it is a future forgery document);

In light of the fact that each identification card was produced by the police and the prosecutor, and that the authenticity and forgery of the identification card was likely to be easily known, the selection of fines shall be made.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;