If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On July 27, 2017, the Defendant access to the NAV C site (D) at a non-permanent site of Daejeon, not more than Daejeon, to the NAVAC site (hereinafter referred to as the “E”), and, while entering into a dispute with the victim in writing, the Defendant refers to the victim, and the Defendant is crossed off with the NAV, “NER is not the NAC but the NAV.”

Along with the list of crimes in the attached Form, a notice posted comments on the comments "from 200 to 2000 to 2000 to 16 times to insult the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of the witness F, G, and H’s examination protocol outside the trial date [In full view of the victims’ respective legal statements, the specific expressions used by the Defendant in the Defendant’s posting and the entire purport of the posting, etc., this article is deemed to constitute an expression of abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that may undermine the social evaluation of the victims.]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;