From November 2006, the Defendant was operating the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “E”) in cooperation with the victim C in the event of the game strike.

On October 2012, the Defendant, around October 2012, proposed that the Defendant take over G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) operated by F (hereinafter “G”) around December 2012, when he was aware of the concern that the payment of E car insurance will be significantly increased in the future due to the wind of E-owned rental car lessee’s traffic accident, and received consent from the victim by suggesting that the victim take over G jointly with the victim and the victim take charge of the representative director.

Since then, the Defendant proposed that “G will accept KRW 60,00,000, which shared KRW 30,000 each,” but the victim would pay the acquisition price with the E proceeds, and refused the proposal.

As such, the Defendant had had the victim undergo the delivery of the victim’s seal impression, certificate of personal seal, etc. necessary for G underwriting contract, etc., by deceiving the victim as if he/she had taken over G using profits, and had the victim receive the victim’s seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, etc. from the victim. On January 22, 2013, the Defendant stated in the above E office that “A request the victim to have his/her seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, etc. to enter into the G underwriting contract, and received the victim

1. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) instructed the victim to prepare a register of shareholders in the victim’s name stating that “A shall hold 10,000 shares of G shares solely on the same day according to the Defendant’s order, even though he knows that the content delegated by the victim is the preparation of a document in the victim’s name, stating that “A shall hold shares in the form of joint possession of the victim and the Defendant”; and (b) H shall hold 10,00 shares of G shares solely on the same day according to the Defendant’s order.”