beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2018.12.18 2018고단55

업무상횡령등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 16, 2017, the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) by the Seoul High Court on September 7, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant, from around 206 to around 3, 2006, has performed duties such as the selection of a construction work, payment of construction cost, holding of meetings of the association, management of the property of the association, etc. by proxy of the association president of the victim D reconstruction housing association (hereinafter “victim association”) established to build a reconstruction apartment on the part of the head of the association located outside and outside the Jung-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul. At the same time, B was in charge of the registration related to the reconstruction of this case, such as preservation registration, provisional registration, and registration related to the reconstruction of this case as the representative of E (F before the alteration) who performed the reconstruction work at the site of the above apartment.

On August 30, 2007, the victim association obtained authorization for the completion of the "G apartment", a main building consisting of 96 households of apartment buildings and 8 households of commercial buildings (the above apartment reconstruction corporation was a stock company, and the above H was a stock company H up to about 77% of the total ingredients, and then the second city construction corporation was a stock company). Among them, 62 households of apartment buildings were so-called members of the association, and 34 households of commercial buildings and 8 households of commercial buildings were sold in general, but most of the above general apartment buildings leased part payments in the name of both parties in order to secure the construction cost of apartment buildings, etc., and were sold in lots.

On August 21, 2007, the Defendant, on behalf of the victim association, entered into an agreement on the settlement of construction cost with the following: (a) around August 21, 2007, the Defendant: (b) on behalf of the victim association, he shall pay the substitute to I for the 11 household unit; and (c) on behalf of I for the remaining construction cost, he shall pay approximately KRW 1.839 billion for construction cost.

2. The victims of occupational embezzlement related to apartment J-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho-ho,