However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 1. 27. 02:00 경 서울 동대문구 B에 있는 C 편의점 앞길에서 맥주를 마시고 있던 불상의 남성들과 시비되자 피고인의 집에 있던 위험한 물건인 식칼 2 자루( 큰 식칼: 칼날 20cm, 손잡이 12cm, 작은 식칼: 칼날 12cm, 손잡이 11cm )를 양 손에 들고 나와 그 곳에 있던 피해자 D(25 세), 피해자 E(24 세) 을 향해 “ 씨팔놈, 죽여 버린다 ”라고 소리를 치고, 배 부위를 찌르려고 하는 시늉을 하고, 바로 옆 테이블에 그 칼을 ‘ 툭툭’ 치는 등 마치 피해자들의 신체에 어떠한 위해를 가할 듯한 태도를 취하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include the fact that victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship to victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered.