However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 4, 2017, from around 19:00 to 19:25, the Defendant: (a) the fact that the former spouse D was living together with the victim E in the dwelling space of the former spouse D, the Defendant, who had been living with the victim E, from around 19:0 to around 19:25, and (b) whether the Defendant attached the same Mana as the Defendant, as the Defendant had nowhere to attach the same spaws.

“Ackhn the victim’s disease, which is an object dangerous to the well-being of the victim who reported his/her belief by sound, shall be turned into one time, and the escapeer, when driving away from the victim, her face and bridge are several times, he/she saw the victim to take care of the victim for a two-time period of time.

After all, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports, scene, photographs, such as victims, and small-scale disease, and diagnostic certificates;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. According to the reasoning of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime.

It is not agreed with the victim that the crime of this case is being committed and that there is no record of being punished more than a suspended sentence.