However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No one shall provide, exhibit or keep the contents of game products different from those of the game products rated by the Game Products Management Committee for the distribution or use thereof.

Nevertheless, from March 3, 2019 to March 12, 2019, the Defendant operated “CPC” in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu to install five computers in order for customers to use “SPC games”. The Defendant charged large number of unspecified visitors visiting the said PC with game money directly via a manager page different from the contents of the rating classification by the Game Products Management Committee.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes response to the results of appraisal and photograph of seized articles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry Promotion, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (in addition to a fine imposed on a person who commits a crime by committing a crime, there exists no other penal force, and considering the fact that he commits a crime);

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Act, Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;