beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.30 2018고단3139

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On August 30, 2017, Defendant F was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on August 30, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 1, 2018.

[2] Defendant A is a person who operates the game room in the trade name of “K Gameland,” and Defendant A is a person who operates the game room in the above game room, and Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H are employees of the game room.

No one shall arrange for exchange or exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

1. Defendant A and B’s joint crimes committed in collusion with each other from June 20, 2017 to September 13, 2017 exchanged KRW 9,000 after deducting 10% of the commission per 10,000 from the time when they received a request for return according to cumulative points when customers put money in the game machine, put out game, and lose or gain points according to the result.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

2. Defendant C, D, E, F, G, and H’s criminal acts from June 20, 2017 to September 13, 2017; Defendant H served as an employee in the game room from August 11, 2017 to September 13, 2017; and Defendant C, E, F, G, and H, with a view to operating the game room as above and helping them receive points that are the result of the game, even though they knew of the operation of the game room and exchanging points that are the result of the game, and Defendant C, E, F, G, and H made it easy for Defendant D to commit the crime as prescribed in the above Articles 1 and 2 by separating the said money exchange businessman from the money exchange businessman to the said money exchange businessman.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.