If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is an employee who deals with the settlement of the price of goods from February 2, 2009 to November 1, 2013 in the calculation unit of the “Emt” in the “Emt” operated by the victim D in Jeju.

On December 26, 2012, the Defendant purchased goods equivalent to KRW 40,00,00 from the Empt Calculation Board at around 21:06 on December 26, 2012, and then presented the goods to the Defendant to calculate the price, and calculated the bar code marked on the goods by means of entering it into a computer to cancel the item or not inputting the bar code into a computer, and brought about KRW 40,000 of the cash amount corresponding to the price of the goods on the part of the Defendant to the above Accounting Board, and brought about 40,000 of the cash amount corresponding to the price of the goods on the Empt from around 20 to January 9, 2013, and brought about cash equivalent to the price of the goods on the Empt within the Empt, or brought about the goods on the Empt from the list of crimes by taking them out at least 63 times in total, as in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;