A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 18, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed assault on the following grounds: (a) around 23:50 of March 18, 2014: (b) on the part of the E convenience store located in Busan Sho-gu, the victim H (22 years of age) (22 years of age) who was working in the direction of the victim G (22 years of age) who was going through the road, and (c) on the part of the victim H (22 years of age), and (d) the victim H’s face was knenee and body face was knee and hne was kneed once after the victim H’s bridge was cut off; and (e) the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting the victim H’s face and body part, and ging the victim’s appearance beyond the victim’s G’s beam

As a result, the Defendant, together with B and F, committed a bodily injury to the victim H, such as the left-hand bucket, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and assault against the victim G.

B. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant appeared at the court of Busan District Court No. 453 around 16:0, the court of law No. 453, the above court of law 2014, 4848 B, and F, and the Defendant was notified of the right to refuse to testify.

In fact, the Defendant was under way with friendly B and F, as described in 1-A. The Defendant was under way with friendly B and F.

H, G and Sivited B, beyond H’s bridge, and knenee knee knee knee h. H’s face and body h’s face and body knee h’s body h’s face and body h’s body h’s face were assaulted by G, and the Defendant exceeded G.

Nevertheless, the defendant at the court where the above case is being tried, "Attorney : however, at that time the F said case was declared, and the purport of this case is required.

Defendant

: Ne, Mali, Mali, Mali.

변호사 : 그러면 이제 F가 뭐 말렸는데 이제 경찰에 진술을 하러 가게 됐잖아요.

In addition, the reason why the witness had been prior to the suspension of execution at the time, and caused the police investigation due to the instant case, and requested F to receive an investigation on behalf of F and requested F to do so, it is necessary that F was investigated instead of F.

Defendant

N.N.: