2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3...

The court's reasoning for this part is that "B 1" portion of "B 1" connected each point of 61, 62, 63, 64, and 61 in the judgment of the court of first instance is "the result of the cadastral surveying conducted by the appraiser and the vice governor of the Incheon Northernbuk National Land Information Corporation," and "the result of the surveying conducted by the appraiser B and the result of the appraisal conducted by the appraiser B" in the order of 61, 62, 63, 64, and 61 in the attached drawing "B 1" portion of "B 1" connected each point of 61, 62, 63, 64, and 61 in the order of priority among the judgments of the court of first instance, "the result of the surveying commissioned by the court of first instance to the Korea National Land Information Corporation and the result of the appraisal entrusted by the appraiser B," and "the defendant does not recognize the portion of "the above part of the attached table 3's land occupation and use" in the order of 2525, 254,57.

According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of claim, the defendant, without legitimate authority, occupied and used each land and building listed in the separate sheet owned by the plaintiffs, barring any special circumstances. Thus, the defendant is deemed to have occupied and used each land and building listed in the separate sheet owned by the plaintiffs, and thus, to the development of the plaintiff effective city which subrogated the original acquisitor of the land owner or the building listed in the separate sheet, ① the portion of "B 1" in the attached sheet connected each point of the 61, 62, 63, 64, and 61 among the land listed in the attached sheet No. 5 in the separate sheet, and the portion of "B 1" connected each point of the 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, and 65 in the annexed sheet among the land listed in the attached sheet No. 4 in the annexed sheet, and ② the attached sheet No. 1 in the attached sheet.