1. The criminal defendant against the victim AB (26 tax) is not enough to treat the victim AB as the cost of disposal when the siren was involved in the accident at the expense of the victim around August 17, 2012.

The phrase "(100,000 won) was changed."

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party as a person with bad credit standing, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it to the injured party, and there was no plan to use the above money as repair costs of the vehicle.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and obtained KRW 1,00,000,000 from the victim to receive the delivery of the victim on the same day, and acquired it from the time until October 3, 2012, the sum of KRW 8,81,530 on four occasions, such as the list of crimes, was obtained from the victim and obtained from the victim.

2. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant against the Victim AC (35 tax) was guilty. On February 20, 2014, at a mutually infinite coffee shop located in the Suwon Mine-dong, Gwangju, the Defendant may buy a letter to the Victim AC “on the finite finite finite finite finc.

10,000,000 won shall be registered as a driving vehicle within two weeks on the face of the week, and shall be subscribed to insurance.

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to dry the fourth spons.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired the amount of KRW 14.9 million from the victim on February 24, 2014 and acquired it by fraud.

3. The Defendant’s fraud against the Victim AD (35 tax) may be purchased from the Victim AD at any time, whenever necessary, at the mutual influence of the trade name in front of the AE hospital located in the Gwangju Mine-gu at the end of February 2014.

I see at least once in the Cubus. An accident has been repaired once and is fine on the other hand.

The price is KRW 24 million.

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to dry the car.

The defendant.