beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.07.30 2013고단202

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a rocketing car;

On February 26, 2013, around 17:14, the Defendant proceeded along a road in front of the memorial hall in front of the memorial hall, which is located in the Pyeongtaek-gun of Gangseo-gu, Gangwon-do, in accordance with one-lane one-lane distance from the front side of the memorial hall.

At the time, the passage of the E-learning car driven by the victim D(W, 59 years old) in front of the defendant, the defendant, who intends to overtake the above Re-learning car, had a duty of care to take care of not impeding the operation of the above-learning car, and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found it late to turn to the left due to the negligence that the Defendant tried to overtake the above-learning passenger vehicle beyond the central line without properly checking the movement of the above-learning passenger vehicle. However, the Defendant did not avoid it, but did not receive it and received the left part of the driving seat of the above-learning passenger vehicle with the front part of the rocketing passenger vehicle driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying the frighting car owned by the victim F and providing rescue to the victim so that the repair cost, such as the exchange of fright fish, can be equivalent to KRW 1,077,216.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as described in paragraph (1), operated Crocketing car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) as stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1..