When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 2, 2020, at around 16:29, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 on the roads in front of Busan City, 2020, the Defendant: (b) expressed D’s desire to “I am fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fe

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of investigation reports (Analysis and attachment of suspect images), CCTV CDs, and the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The punishment shall be determined by taking into consideration all the conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, including the fact that a police officer in uniformed for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act assaults a police officer, the degree of assault is not much severe, the fact that a fine has been imposed only once, the fact that a crime is recognized, the age, character and conduct of the accused, the background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.