2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. (1) The Land Survey Book prepared during the Japanese Occupation Period is written by the I, i.e., Kimpo-gun, Kimpo-gun, the land prior to the division of each of the instant real estate (referred to as the “Geopo-si E” as of the administrative district change), and the G 3,072 (hereinafter referred to as the “IMo-si”) and the G 3,072 (hereinafter referred to as the “IMo-si land,” each of which was the mother land of the instant case.

(2) The Plaintiff’s fleetJ transferred his permanent domicile to Gyeongsung on September 26, 1936, and died on April 26, 1938, and his two descendants died on July 5, 1935, which was before the J’s death. The J’s two descendants died on November 10, 1959, and transferred them to her wife and A on November 10, 1959, after N was deceased on August 3, 1998, and after A died on September 8, 2014, the Plaintiff succeeded to A.

(3) The Plaintiff’s prior domicile of Ma is Ma, which is the name of the G, and the “J of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G,” which was indicated as the domicile of the name holder I, was changed to the “S of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of

(4) The Defendant completed each of the instant registrations on the instant real property.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 9, 12 through 14, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, where it is found that the person in charge of the assessment of each real estate of this case and the Plaintiff’s fleet M are the same person, and there is a separate person in charge of the assessment of the land for which the registration of preservation of ownership has been made under the name of the State, the presumption of the registration of preservation of ownership is invalid because the presumption of the registration of preservation of ownership has been destroyed, and thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant

2. Defendant.