【Criminal Records】

1. On November 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court (2014 order 6816 order) and completed the enforcement of the sentence at the Incheon Detention House on January 15, 2015.

2. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for four months at the Incheon District Court for fraud, and such judgment was the same month.

9. A final and conclusive judgment (2015 order 720, group 720), August 13, 2015, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment for four months for fraud (2015 order 4013, group 4013) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Incheon detention center on October 23, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 2015, at around 21:00, the Defendant was provided with a cafeteria operated by the victim D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the fact was committed as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value even if he was provided with food from the injured party, and was provided with a marries equivalent to KRW 7,000 in the market value from the injured party.

In addition, from that point to December 29, 2015, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to 140,400 won in total from 11 victims, as described in Appendix I, by the same method as above.

2. The defendant interfering with his/her duties may ask the defendant who takes a mixed bath while giving sound to the victim D or more, at the time, time, place, and place described in paragraph (1).

Even though they expressed a large voice, they interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance.

In addition, from that time to January 7, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant or PC room business by force to 12 victims, as shown in Appendix II by the same method.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the acknowledgement of each fraud committed in the holding and the re-recognition of the attached Table II of crime Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 among the crimes that interfere with each business set forth in the holding);

1. The witness E, F, G, and H’s legal statement (the Defendant’s respective acts interfered with the Defendant’s respective duties as indicated in the judgment, and the part II, 3, 4, 6, and 10, of the annexed crime list II, shall be those acts.