Facts of recognition

Gender: Women, date of birth, and age: The monetary assessment for working ability for the degree of 50 years of age and 35.33 years of age at the time of an accident: 6,622 won in February 209; 67,909 won in September 2009; 68,965 won in January 201; 70,497 won in September 201; 72,415 won in January 201; 74,08 won in September 201; 75,608 won in around September 201; 8, 201 in September 201; 30,90 in March 28, 201; 308 won in March 1, 201; 30,97,308 won in March 28, 2013; and 40,308 won in January 28, 2013;

Since it falls under 5-d-2-b of Mabroth disability and labor ability loss rate: 24% for urban daily workers, and 30% of the contribution of the king (the spathal change of post signboards No. 5-003, Aug. 2, 2006) which was examined by the Gannan University East University East University Hospital was observed).* The part that is not admitted by the plaintiff's assertion that the accident in this case occurred, the plaintiff argued that he suffered from the post facto disability of the Mabrothy disability, the Mabrothy disease (mental, mythy), the Mabrothy disorder (neythythythythythythythythythythythythy), and the part that is not recognized by the plaintiff's assertion that he suffered from the post facto disability of the Mabroth (neythythythythythythy), the result of each physical assessment (the draft, mental and Maololythy and the Seoul University.).

However, the result of the appraiser's appraisal in the civil procedure is only one of the methods of evidence, and the judge can determine the labor ability loss rate different from the specific appraisal result by means of free evaluation by comprehensively taking into account all the evidence in the case in question, and the parties can also contest the validity of the appraisal result by asserting and supporting evidence (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Da27777, Jun. 28, 2002). Thus, the traffic accident and the supplementary disability claimed by the plaintiff are between the traffic accident and the plaintiff.