The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the court below affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance which found the defendant guilty on the ground that there was no proof of crime as to the charge of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) against the defendant, and rejected the defendant as to the charge of violence against the victim I, and affirmed the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the charge of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.). In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the remaining guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal nor any statement of grounds for appeal in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.