2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant had a history of criminal punishment several times for the same crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period despite being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in 2014; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period despite being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in 2014; (d) when the instant game site was controlled, he/she led his/her employee E to the game room business; (c) factors favorable to sentencing, such as the Defendant’s period of running the game room is not less than 15 days; and (d) factors favorable to sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines and the scope of sentencing guidelines as indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.