On January 1, 2017, the victim B (n, 21 years of age), C, and D had the Defendant’s land and vision from the “Fju store” located in the building E in Pocheon-si around 03:00, while the Defendant’s land and vision were punished, they were dissatisfied with the Defendant in the first floor toilets above the above main point.

The victim first got her head on the ground that the defendant was at the time of her her her head, shaking the defendant's head debt, leaving the defendant over the floor, and her head was taken by drinking.

Accordingly, as the defendant set up against the victim, C and D are combined with the body of the defendant in drinking, and C are faced with the head of the defendant and the head of the defendant in both sides.

As a result, the victims, C, and D jointly inflicted injury on the defendant, such as the 28-day treatment of the victim, C, and D.

The defendant argued with the victim at the above date, time, and place as above, and followed the victim's head at the time of her booming the victim's head, booming the victim's face, and faced the victim's fingers.

As a result, the defendant got the victim a 3-day human bridge of the left-hand balance in need of treatment for about 2 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written diagnosis on B;

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, according to the witness B’s legal statement and the defendant’s partial statement, it is recognized that the victim’s left-side fingers, which was disputed at the time and place in the judgment of the court, was broken down. According to the doctor H’s diagnosis document, it is recognized that the victim suffered injury that requires two-time medical treatment due to the victim’s 3-month human intercourse on the left-hand side.

Considering that the victim was taking advantage of the victim's prescription, such as antibiotics, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant's injury in the judgment has been committed.

On the other hand, the defendant and his defense counsel committed harmful acts.