However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant was driving a B SP vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.171% in a section of about 1km from the front of the central district unit in the area of the wife population Kim Quantity-dong to the flow distance of the name land located north-dong in the area of the wife population at permissible time, on October 23, 2015.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Registration of Residents shall use any third person's resident registration number unlawfully;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around October 2, 2015, expressed to the head of the Dong-dong Police Station in Yeongdeungpo-dong Police Station, which was under the influence of drinking driving, a letter of the resident registration number of the type D, which was usual in order to conceal the fact that the Defendant was born due to the unpaid fine, from around 23:06 on October 2, 2015, to the head of the Dong-dong Police Station in Gyeonggi-dong Police Station in charge of traffic control, and to the head of the Dong-dong Police Station in charge of traffic control.

Accordingly, the defendant used D's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. The Defendant demanded, at the same time, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, that the border C puts his/her name on the master driver’s circumstantial report stating the Defendant’s personal information, and, for the purpose of exercising, stated “D” in the sexual name column and presented D’s signature next thereto, as if he/she was genuinely formed to the above border C.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising his/her right, and used a forged signature.

B. The Defendant, who determined that the Defendant was D at the time, time, and place as referred to in paragraph 2, entered the Defendant’s personal information, details, etc. in the notification of the results of drinking driving control into the Transport Computer Network in PDA, and demanded the Defendant to sign the Defendant. As such, the Defendant issued an electronic order with D “D” to PDA, and presented the same as if it was genuine to C, who knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and forged it.