업무방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 2018. 5. 2. 07:55 경부터 30분 가량 광주 광산구에 있는 피해자 B이 운영하는 C 식당에서 피해 자가 대리 운전기사를 불러 주지 않았다는 이유로 피해자와 성명 불상의 손님들에게 “ 너는 뭐야 새끼야, 대리 불러, 이 새끼들이 한꺼번에 팰라고 왔네,
In order to avoid the disturbance, such as taking a pule and taking a bath, etc., the victim interfered with the operation of the restaurant by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B
1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Order to Attend the lecture [the grounds for sentencing] - Type 1 (Interference with Business] [the person subject to special sentencing] - [the scope of recommendations] mitigation area / [the scope of recommendations] mitigation area / [the scope of recommendations] January - 8 months / [the above sentencing person and the defendant can have criminal records of a fine for the same kind of crime, the degree of power exercised by the defendant, the circumstances leading to the crime, etc.