2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The father of the plaintiff shall have the same year as April 23, 1998.

5. 14. He heard from the Defendant’s mother C that educational expenses need to be borne by the Defendant, and lent KRW 6,000,000 per annum to 15% interest rate per annum.

However, C did not pay the above money, and the father of the Plaintiff died in 2004, and the Plaintiff succeeded to the above loan claims of his father.

Since the above loans were used as university enrollment fees by the defendant, the defendant shall pay the above loans and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

Judgment

As alleged by the Plaintiff, even if the Defendant’s mother borrowed KRW 6,00,000 from the Plaintiff’s father and used it as Defendant’s educational expenses, the parties to the loan agreement are the Plaintiff’s father and the Defendant’s mother C, and there is no legal basis for the Defendant, not C, to repay the loan.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit to further examine.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.