A. According to the Gyeonggi Won-gun Land Survey Board written during the Japanese occupation period, D residing in the above C shall be 44.00 (1911), and D's name residing in the above C

7. It is written in 30. 30. 30. Gyeonggi Won-gun E (hereinafter referred to as “instant maternity land”) as being subject to assessment.

B. After that, the Gyeonggi-do Suwon-gun was changed to the F of Gyeonggi-gun, the administrative district was changed to F. The mother land of this case was divided into 160 square meters from Sep. 19, 1960, 176 (the same day was changed to the ditch from the answer), 134 square meters from Jan. 31, 197, G 160 square meters into G 529 square meters on Jan. 31, 197, H 176 square meters into H 582 square meters, H 134 square meters into H 134 square meters, and thereafter H 582 square meters into two different administrative districts due to the change of land category on Feb. 13, 2004, and the change of the administrative district as of Feb. 582 square meters into the previous one (hereinafter referred to as “the previous one”).

C. On June 20, 1996, the Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership of the instant land (hereinafter “registration of initial ownership”) by the receipt office of Suwon District Court No. 34615.

The plaintiff's father-in D (D, 19 years old 19 years old 186) died on January 10, 1963 and succeeded to D's property, which is his children, K, L, M, and N. After K died on February 9, 1976, K's children, including the plaintiff, were succeeded to K's property.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 3 to 4 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in each of the statements in Gap evidence No. 1-1, Gap evidence No. 2, No. 5-8 (including each number), as to the plaintiff's claim, D's domicile at the time of the situation, the assessment title of the mother's land of this case, is Gyeonggi-gu Group C. The plaintiff's legal domicile at the time of the situation, as well as the plaintiff's assistance title, is theO of Gyeonggi-gu Group, the situation title, and the name of Cho and the plaintiff's assistance title are the same, etc. at the time of the situation, and the above facts are identical to Eul at the time of the situation.