However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 15, 2016, around 17:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 354, at the Extraordinary District Court 4, the 2016 highest order 3605 highest order 3605 highest order against C as a witness.

Defendant 1 was examined before the presiding judge in charge of the instant case, and the Prosecutor’s “Is the witness who printed out the account transaction details in paper” from D to D to July 2014.

“I have come to go to the question”.

1. Giving answers to " and brought to him/her"

Defendant’s liability on his part

D It is essential to keep one copy of the corporate account transactions held by the Corporation.

If the investigation agency has so stated, it shall be asked

“I have brought to the question”.

There is no theft in the question of “the truth, the statement of the principal, the truth, and the truth,” if any, that statement made by the counsel as “incompetence of accuracy,” which reads “the truth, the statement of the principal,”

On July 2014, “The testimony was made to the effect that there was no theft of the details of the corporate account transactions at D offices with the content of the corporate account transactions at D offices.”

However, on July 2014, the Defendant had one copy of the above D's account transaction statement at the office of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Copies of the trial records in Daegu District Court Order 2016 High Court Order 3, 3605 and the trial records in Category A;

1. A copy of the protocol of interrogation of the suspect to the prosecution (including the F and E part concerning the statement) against the accused;

1. Two copies of the protocol concerning the examination of suspects of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Decision (2016 High Court Decision 4), sentence (2016No. 2418), sentence of judgment (2016No. 2418), and sentence (2016Do 17044, dismissal of appeal)

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to attach some of the records of trial of the Daegu High Court 2015 No. 346 and to attach the register of the D Juristic Person);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;