beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.18 2016고단2097

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at a flood control center, and was released on January 29, 2016 during the execution of the sentence in the flood control center.

2.8. The parole period expired.

"2016 Highest 2097"

1. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the Defendant’s dwelling place located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, D’s 616, the Defendant sent a letter “E” to the Internet NVV “S Highest Republic” car page using a mobile phone, and then, the victim F would contact the victim and send 130,000 won to the new bank account (Account Number: I) in H’s name to transfer KRW 130,000 to the bank account (Account Number: I).

However, in fact, the defendant did not have G contact pockets at the time, and he thought that he would use the ticket price that he received from the injured party for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc., so even if he would receive the ticket price from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the contact pockets normally.

Defendant 1:30,00 won as the price for contact diskettes around 10:40 on February 17, 2016 by deceiving the victim as above and deceiving the victim, and received 130,000 won from the victim as such, and the list of crimes in attached form from around that time to April 5, 2016 by the same method.

1. A total of 14 times as described in the statement, by deceiving 12 victims, and by delivery of 1,540,000 won in total from the victims.

"2016 Highest 2652"

2. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) accessed the Defendant’s residence located in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, the Defendant, using a mobile phone, into the Internet Neneber “China-China” car page; and (b) made a false statement to the victim JJ stating that “When remitting KRW 100,000,000, the Defendant will send Chapter IV of the Berland.”

However, the defendant did not have the right to use the Ireland at the time, and received money from the injured party.