In the process of expressing the victim's right to talk, the injured party expressed the victim's right to talk, and the defendant took the victim's right to talk, and the defendant took the victim's right to talk with the church as if he had been aware of the victim's right to talk with the church, and the defendant took the victim's right to talk with the victim.

For the above reasons, the Defendant moved to the Defendant’s house (G lending No. 305) located in F at the Seocho-si, but all of the two persons were under the influence of alcohol.

After that, the defendant tried to do so to the victim “I wish to do so once” and to do so at the convenience store in a place where he takes a drinking again with the shoulder victim at around 04:34 on the following day, and the victim “I am why I am.”

In this sense, I tried to file a petition with the Defendant, i.e., the “Good Hague”, and the Defendant.

From that time, the Defendant demanded the victim to rapidly or repeatedly change his sexual organ or repeated sexual intercourse, and demanded the same demand on the same day as the victim around 07:33 on the same day when he gets off the drinking to the convenience store. On the same day, the Defendant tried to have sexual intercourse with the victim by force around 10:30 on the same day when he continued to drink back to around 08:28 on the same day, and 10:30 on the same day when she was under the influence of drinking, and her hand pushed off the victim by pushing the victim with his hand, and her scambling, and scams the victim’s scam and body were scambling, and scambling the victim’s resistance to the victim’s scam and panty, and inserted the Defendant’s sexual organ into the negative part of the victim.