업무상횡령
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for a term of eight months, two years of suspended execution of imprisonment for a term of eight months, community service hours, 80 hours) of the lower court is too unreasonable;
2. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment by taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant.
In full view of all the circumstances that serve as conditions for sentencing in this court, the judgment of the court below was judged to have exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion, or there is no special change in circumstances that may change the sentence of the court below.
In addition, even if the sentencing grounds revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, background and consequence of the crime, etc., are comprehensively taken into account, the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.
The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.