If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

On January 4, 2016, around 07:00, the Defendant: (a) laid the body of the victim E (V) in front of the D church education center in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu; (b) laid down the floor by cutting down the body of the victim E (V) beyond the floor; and (c) laid down the victim over approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that according to the evidence of each judgment, under the circumstance that police officers who already received a report are dispatched to an educational officer and block the entry of an educational officer, the defendant was in front of

It is recognized that the injury was inflicted by 68 years of age beyond the victim.

Even if the Defendant had the intent to protect the infringement of the legal interests of the believers who had been towed by the education officer, due to the Defendant’s intrusion into the education officer, and the theft at the place, etc., committed by the Defendant or together with the education officer.

In light of the type, degree, method of infringement, the level of completion of infringement act, and the type, degree, etc. of legal interest to be infringed by the defense act, the above act by the defendant cannot be deemed as a reasonable act in light of social norms.