An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

On March 31, 2012, around 02:20 on March 31, 2012, the Defendant was waiting to stop due to the victim B (34 years of age) who was working for a taxi after driving a vehicle on the street in front of the teketel 95-7, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to enter into the emulculation.

The Defendant, on the ground that the victim was not on board the taxi as soon as possible, sent a horn to the victim, and the Defendant, who caused the victim, was mistaken for the victim to have expressed his desire to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant, who gets off from the vehicle, opened a door of the back seat of the victim with the shot-si, and made two times the face of the victim once, once, and twice the head of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a non-alley, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 32 (1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Applications for Compensation Orders (the scope of liability for damages is not clear);