However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is a person subject to call-up of public duty personnel.

Around April 10, 2013, the Defendant received a notice from the director of the Seoul Regional Military Manpower Office to call to the Army Training Center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Regional Military Manpower Office on May 16, 2013 at the Army Training Center located in Chungcheongnam-gu Seoul District Military Manpower Office to respond to the call to the call from the public duty personnel service personnel under the name of the director of the Seoul Regional Military Manpower Office. On April 22, 2013, the Defendant received a notice from the director of the Seoul Regional Military Manpower Office to call to the public duty personnel service personnel service under the name of the director of the Seoul Regional Military Manpower Office (Seoul Special Metropolitan City C and 104) on the Defendant’s office located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City C and 10

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. The date of call-up of public interest service personnel, adjustment and notification thereof, receipt of notification, and application of statutes;

1. Article 88 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the defendant is able to respond to convening, taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as shown in the argument of the case, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in the same manner as the order of sentencing.