If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Defendant

A installed 48 game machine for "D" in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, with 48 game machine for "D", and operated a substantial business of the above game room. Defendant B is a person who invested in the game room business as a permitted person of the above game room (permission number E). The Defendants are expected to divide the amount of profit into 5:5 with respect to the benefit while operating the above game room.

Game products are classified as a game product in which 20,000 won won won won won won won won is awarded to "Royala Plus City", which is the highest satisfaction point from the Game Rating Board.

From August 2, 2012 to November 16, 2011 of the same year, the Defendants offered a game product different from the content of the rating classification, such as providing an unspecified number of game products with a 158,000 won and 5,000 points and 18,000 points and 2,000 points and 1,000 points and 2,000 points and 1,000 points and 1,000 points and 1,000 points and 1,000 points and 2,000 points and 1,000 points and 1,000 points and 1,00 won in the game screen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Data on response to the results of appraisal;

1. Application of seizure records and list statutes;

1. Defendants: Article 45 subparag. 4 and Article 32(1)2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act