The defendant of "2018 Highest 1275" was punished on August 3, 2007 by a Cheongju District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On September 10, 2007, a fine of one million won is imposed for the same crime in the same court on September 10, 2007, and a fine of five million won is imposed for the same crime in the same court on October 7, 2013.

On June 7, 2018, at around 22:20, the Defendant driven D Poter in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.075% from the section of about 7 km from the front of the restaurant where it is impossible to find out the trade name in the Heung-gu Gung-gu Gung-gu Gungdong-si, Cheongju to the front road of the restaurant located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

around 22:40 on June 7, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Godan1753”, at G cafeteria operated by the Victim F in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, reported 112 to the effect that drinking is running, and the police officer dispatched to the site was able to walk through the restaurant parking lot of the victim and intruded on the building managed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1275"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on internal investigation (report on the control details), report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, investigation report, report on the results of the control of drunk driving, notification on the results of the investigation (report on the situation of a drinking driver), and report on investigation (in cases of a suspect A's blood alcohol concentration);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and investigation reports (verification, etc. of suspect's records of driving alcohol);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and imprisonment with prison labor for each of the following categories:

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders committed the instant crime even though the defendant had a number of same kinds of records, and the circumstances of drinking driving or intrusion upon residence have also been observed.