2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff in the Gu office is working.

A. On February 14, 2007, the Industrial Bank of Korea concluded a mortgage agreement with regard to the debtor’s stone construction company (hereinafter “E land”), the scope of secured debt, and the maximum debt amount as KRW 80 million with respect to the 186.20 square meters in storage of the steel framed & sand site, the steel framed & sand site, and the 186.20 square meters in storage of one story, the above ground Nadong and other roof storage facilities, the manager 84.39 square meters in general, the 84.39 square meters in the above ground, and the 132 square meters in the Ma-si road (hereinafter “E land”).

(hereinafter “instant mortgage contract”). B.

The Industrial Bank of Korea completed the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “instant right to collateral security”) on D land based on the instant contract to collateral security as follows.

Of the D land which is the object of the instant right to collateral security, the “total C Shares and No. 3C Shares” are 3989/5137 Shares.

On February 14, 2007, the joint collateral security building D, land E, and the Industrial Bank of Korea completed the registration of creation of a neighboring mortgage on land E, based on the instant collateral security contract, on the following grounds for registration of the right holder and other matters: 6A/C shares and the entire amount of the 3/C shares; and 800,000,000 won of the maximum debt amount; 6A/C shares and the total amount of the 3/C shares; 4.00,000 won of the joint collateral security contract.

The priority number registration shall be received by the holder of a right to the grounds for registration and other matters, 6A, 1C shares, 2C shares, and 800,000,000 won (the maximum debt amount of the contract on February 14, 2007, 200,000 won), joint-mortgaged land D C shares, buildings D

C. After that, the Industrial Bank of Korea transferred the instant collateral security to the Plaintiff, a limited liability company specializing in pre-payment of young children’s stocks, and a limited liability company specializing in pre-payment of young children’s stocks.

The defendant on February 6, 2013 shall be D.