When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 12:22 on May 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) laid down two plastic stuffs and one plastic container on the market price of the victim’s ownership, which was accumulated in the open storage room managed by the victim C, in e.g., the Defendant: (b) committed theft.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (CCTV image analysis in the case field), investigation report (CCTV analysis and confirmation of damaged products, and addition);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged was stolen by the Defendant, in addition to the things indicated in the judgment at the time, place, and the date, time, and place of the judgment, three new city (the size 2m x 6m 2m x 2m x 4m 1m x 4m 1m m) and three plastic gambling boxes on the market value of the victim’s own.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the above three new city and three plastic boxes have been additionally brought at the date and place in the judgment of the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The defendant consistently stated that the police has brought only plastic gambling and plastic containers at the location of the judgment from this court to this court, and that there is no need to bring a new view.

B. Examining the visual images of CCTV that read the road in front of the site of the occurrence of the instant case (hereinafter “the site of the instant case”), the Defendant: (a) went to the direction near the site of the instant case after leaving a vehicle on the road; and (b) coming to the direction towards the site of the port; (c) coming to the vehicle while driving the vehicle (it does not seem accurately whether the Defendant carried with any object and carried on the vehicle), and (d) passing through CCTV.