beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2015가단5082200

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 96,904,80 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 25, 2015 to November 25, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 28, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) sought to have a vehicle with a locking device installed because it wants to keep the goods in the between between the two vehicles; (b) the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease the instant vehicle from the Defendant on the recommendation of the B Escoo vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); and (c) the Defendant entered into the agreement with the Defendant to lease the instant vehicle.

B. C as an employee of the Defendant, prepared a vehicle lease contract on behalf of the Defendant at the time when the Plaintiff rents the instant vehicle, and delivered the instant vehicle to the Plaintiff, and thereafter the Plaintiff was in charge of management.

C. At around 01:00 on December 1, 2014, C knew that the instant vehicle was parked by using the Defendant’s location tracking system, and subsequently, C opened the instant vehicle’s parking at the instant vehicle’s vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable at the Defendant’s storage of the instant vehicle’s vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vegetable vege vege vege vege vege vege vege vege

(hereinafter “the theft of this case”). D.

C was arrested on or around February 12, 2015, and the Plaintiff recovered KRW 8,566,000 from C for a stolen check and cash, and recovered KRW 23 million for a capf vehicle purchased by C for a stolen money (hereinafter “motherf vehicle”), and collected KRW 7,300,000 by selling the visibility purchased with a stolen money by C for a stolen money (hereinafter “the visibility of this case”).

E. C was prosecuted for committing the instant larceny, and on March 27, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of two years in October, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it became final and conclusive.

(hereinafter referred to as "relevant criminal case"). [Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, and Gap Nos. 1 through 1.