beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단494

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B lebrober vehicles.

Around 02:50 on January 27, 2018, the Defendant was driving the above vehicle and stopped on a four-lane road near the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul city as the bankruptcy of Gangnam-gu in order to proceed again from the 206-lane of the bankruptcy park to the direction of the city hospital distance, while changing the lanes to the three-lane.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to inform the driver of the vehicle of the change of course by direction, etc., and to prevent the accident by changing the vehicle line safely while keeping the traffic situation of the front and rear left well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and instead changed the vehicle line by negligence, and received the fronter on the right side of the victim C(SM6) driving of the 26-year-old DSS6 vehicle from the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., of the aggregate bed for about four weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence as above. Although the Defendant destroyed and damaged the MF6 vehicle owned by the victim to take approximately KRW 1,929,665 of repair cost, the Defendant left the vehicle immediately and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim.

The defendant of "2019 Highest 449" is a driver of the B lerade passenger car.

On December 30, 2018, around 06:30 on December 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven the said B E-F car before the Gangnam-gu Seoul E-gu E-H car; (b) arrived at the H “H” restaurant located in the same Gu.

The Defendant, at the above “H” restaurant, has a reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling at a police officer upon receipt of 112 report that the vehicle had been driving on the left and left, drinking, inaccurate, and repeated words unrelated to questions, etc., and on the same day from the police officer J to which the Defendant belongs.