2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”) and entrusted by the Minister of Labor with an industrial accident compensation business, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile mutual-aid insurance contract with respect to Asi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. B, around 22:30 on April 30, 201, driven the Defendant vehicle and stopped to get off the passengers while driving four lanes of the fourth line of the 66rd line in Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu in order to get off the passengers on the side of the west-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul. However, in order to turn down from the front distance to the left, the driver’s negligence of changing the vehicle from the four-lane to the one straight line immediately, and the driving of the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “victim”) driving the vehicle driving along the two-lane from the after the after the end of the end of the stop to avoid a collision with the Defendant vehicle, which led to the damage of the son’s unclaimed and the injury of the blood uniforms.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On June 9, 2011, the Plaintiff paid 7,815,450 won in total, including the payment of 5,49,190 won in medical care benefits (from April 30, 2011 to May 30, 201), 11,350 won in medical care benefits (from June 16, 201) on July 21, 201, and 252,270 won in medical care benefits on August 17, 201, including the payment of 2,052,640 won in temporary layoff benefits and 252,270 won in medical care benefits (from July 7, 201 to 12, 201) (the total amount of medical care benefits and 5,762,781, 202, 205, 640 won in temporary layoff benefits).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact of recognition of the liability for damages and the occurrence of the right to indemnity, since the accident of this case occurred by negligence, which caused the rapid change of the vehicle, from four lanes to one lane, while driving the defendant vehicle, the defendant, who is the insurer of the above vehicle, sustained the victim by the accident of this case.