2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 24, 2013, at around 23:00, a fire occurred on the left side of the entrance of the front gate, Kimpo-si A apartment No. 114-dong 801 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(hereinafter “instant fire”). B.

On December 25, 2013, B, who resided in the instant apartment at the time of the instant fire, filed a report with the Kimpo-gu Police Station on the purport that “If you turn on the electric rail at the small apartment room of the instant apartment, I would like to do so at the lower apartment room, I would like to see B, and she would have come to a small bank again, and she would have come to go off,” but on January 29, 2014, the Kimpo-gu Police Station changed the statement to the effect that “I turned on the electric rail at the time of the instant fire, and put on the fluence above the bed.”

C. The wife B stated, at the time of police investigation, that “The cause is convictioned as having occurred in the electrical fence because he left a small room and she left a sloping.”

The main point of the results of the appraisal by the National Scientific Investigation and Research Institute on the electric scams collected from the room where the instant fire occurred (hereinafter “the electric scams of this case”) and the electric scams of the electric scams (hereinafter “the electric scams of this case”). The main point of the appraisal by the National Scientific Investigation and Research Institute was that “the operational condition of the electric scams of this case is nothing more than the discussion group, and whether the operation condition of the electric scams of this case is nothing more than the discussion group, and whether the electric scams of the electric scams of the electric scams of

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 7, 10 through 12 (except for the part not trusted in the front) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant fire occurred due to excessive heat on the electric design board of this case.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 3 of the Product Liability Act and Article 750 of the Civil Act, the Defendant, who is the manufacturer of the instant electrical shop, shall pay the victims the fire insurance money, and the Plaintiff, who subrogated the victims, shall be entitled to the indemnity amount of KRW 94,082,069.