성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and by a fine not exceeding seven thousand won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
After leasing the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 703, the Defendant placed an advertisement on the Internet website with the trade name of “C” and operated a commercial sex acts business establishment.
The Defendant, on October 23, 2014, from October 28, 2014 to October 28, 2014, engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic by allowing female employees D, who were waiting in the above officetel, to engage in sexual intercourse with customers, in return for advertising at the above business establishment, and in return for 350,000 won from the customers who did not contact with them.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Written statements of D;
1. Application of statutes governing field photographs and internet advertising photographs;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;
1. The types (one to three years) in the aggravated area (one year and three years), such as the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, (one-year brokerage, etc. for commercial sex acts due to the receipt, delivery, etc. of business prices), shall be added to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of recommendations] and the brokerage of commercial sex acts using a medium
2. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the defendant's specific reasons for sentencing reflects his/her mistake and does not repeat the crime, and on the grounds that the defendant has no criminal record of identical offense, taking into account the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, size and period of business and circumstances before and after the crime, etc.