If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On September 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on September 2, 2015, at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) took a bath by: (c) stating that the Defendant is unable to drink any disturbance by drinking alcohol; (d) stating that the Defendant cannot provide any further drinking; and (e) stating that the Defendant was able to take a walk; and (e) stating that the Defendant was able to take a walk, she was able to have the customers in the said restaurant, and (e) taking a sound into the floor by gathering the b0 minutes of the noise, leaving the string, and leaving the string off the string.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the victimized person.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph 1. The Defendant, at the time and place, and at the victim’s seat belonging to the Seoul Central Police Station F District of Seoul Central Police Station (hereinafter “Seoul Central Police Station”) and the victim’s warning room H avoided the Defendant’s disturbance, she should be seen as the Defendant’s employees at the above restaurant, and she should be seen as the Defendant’s employees and many customers, she should be seen as the Defendant, she must be seen as the Defendant, she must be seen as the Defendant’s employees, she should be seen as the Defendant’s employees, she should be seen as the Defendant’s employees, she should be treated as the Defendant’s eye, she

The Defendant continued to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, such as interference with his duties, and assaulted the H’s clothes and breath, flapsing the arms, flapsing the head of the said H once with the hand floor, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of public duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A complaint filed by H and G;

1. Application of a criminal investigation report, evidence photographing statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Interference with business affairs: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines;

(b) The point of insult: Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines;

(c) hindering the performance of official duties: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.