The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of insult and self-defense or legitimate act, legality of arrest of a flagrant offender,

In addition, even upon examining the record, the first instance court and the lower judgment did not err by violating the law regarding the trial procedure and by infringing on the defendant’s right to defense, as alleged in the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.