beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.10.30 2018가단16796

손해배상(기)

Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne individually by each person.

Reasons

The Plaintiff against the Defendant was finally determined on October 2, 2008 by the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2008Kadan14599, which became final and conclusive on October 2, 2008, and sought an extension of prescription through the instant lawsuit on the ground that the completion of the statute of limitations for the claim for the amount of judgment in accordance with the said

The plaintiff's appeal against the above judgment was filed along with the filing of the lawsuit in this case, and the subsequent decision of recommending reconciliation was confirmed on June 3, 2020 in the appellate procedure of Seoul Western District Court 2020Na111, Seoul Western District Court 2020Na111, and the plaintiff's claim in this case based on the premise that the plaintiff's judgment against the defendant against the defendant becomes final and conclusive is significant in this court. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal in this case based on the premise that the plaintiff's judgment against

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case for the extension of the prescription period of the plaintiff's final and conclusive payment claim is deemed necessary at the time of filing the plaintiff's lawsuit, and therefore, the lawsuit cost is borne by each party under Article 99 of the